Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kathy Casciani's avatar

OK, that response is definitely weird and makes no sense, but I have to think it is coming from someone who has limited PR experience and who has a boss with equally limited experience. I can see why they ask if something is a paid opportunity or not - there are plenty of awards and lists out there where you have to pay an entry fee or it is P2P - but passing on a purely editorial piece like this makes no sense. I think a lot of brand folks don't really understand that being included in a roundup article with their competitors isn't necessarily a bad thing. They often want to be the only one in the story, and that somehow it is bad if their competitors are listed too. I've definitely had to have the conversation explaining that that's not how it works in PR/editorial and that there is still great value in roundups, especially if the article points out some of their unique features or selling points.

Expand full comment
Tara DiMilia's avatar

I can understand inquiring about the type of story, if there is a cost associated and the overall tone and approach. I think that them declining is a loss indeed. There are some clients who just don't want to be in articles or roundups with competitors, and personally and professionally, I think that's a loss. Anything that points to your brands best assets is something to take advantage of. This is from Caren Begun (caren.begun@tmstrat.com).

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts